You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Efficacy of tailored-print interventions to promote physical activity: a systematic review of randomised trials
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, October 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/1479-5868-8-113 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Camille E Short, Erica L James, Ronald C Plotnikoff, Afaf Girgis |
Abstract |
Computer-tailored physical activity interventions are becoming increasingly popular. Recent reviews have comprehensively synthesised published research on computer-tailored interventions delivered via interactive technology (e.g. web-based programs) but there is a paucity of synthesis for interventions delivered via traditional print-based media in the physical activity domain (i.e. tailored-print interventions). The current study provides a systematic review of the tailored-print literature, to identify key factors relating to efficacy in tailored-print physical activity interventions. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 108 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 30% |
Researcher | 16 | 14% |
Student > Master | 14 | 13% |
Other | 8 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
Other | 16 | 14% |
Unknown | 18 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 25 | 23% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 17% |
Social Sciences | 14 | 13% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 6% |
Sports and Recreations | 7 | 6% |
Other | 18 | 16% |
Unknown | 21 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2011.
All research outputs
#6,443,738
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#1,484
of 2,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,353
of 150,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#15
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,116 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 150,537 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.