You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Understanding effects in reviews of implementation interventions using the Theoretical Domains Framework
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, June 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13012-015-0280-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elizabeth A. Little, Justin Presseau, Martin P. Eccles |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 31% |
| Australia | 2 | 15% |
| Canada | 1 | 8% |
| Finland | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 10 | 77% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 136 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 24 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 24 | 17% |
| Unknown | 34 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 24% |
| Psychology | 18 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Unknown | 45 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2015.
All research outputs
#5,269,881
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#908
of 1,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,208
of 281,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#21
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,822 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,202 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.