Peer 2
The aim of my study was not to start a witch hunt, but to force a discussion for how improve the reproducibility in life science and cancer research...
The aim of my study was not to start a witch hunt, but to force a discussion for how improve the reproducibility in life science and cancer research...
Peer 2, as another non-perfect scientist, I am curious: Have you ever posted criticisms of other papers for problems similar to that in your Figure 1C of this paper? Or, as with the OP above, are…
First of all, I have never claimed to be perfect and I do mistakes like most other scientists. In this case the loading control for the EGFR blot was not included...
Differential splicing. Isn't he the first author of the 25 percent duplication in cancer papers study? One would have thought such perfectionist would do a better job in his own papers.