You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Oxytocin may be useful to increase trust in others and decrease disruptive behaviours in patients with Prader-Willi syndrome: a randomised placebo-controlled trial in 24 patients
|
---|---|
Published in |
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, June 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/1750-1172-6-47 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Maïthe Tauber, Carine Mantoulan, Pierre Copet, Joseba Jauregui, Genevieve Demeer, Gwenaëlle Diene, Bernadette Rogé, Virginie Laurier, Virginie Ehlinger, Catherine Arnaud, Catherine Molinas, Denise Thuilleaux |
Abstract |
Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) is a complex neurodevelopmental genetic disorder with hypothalamic dysfunction, early morbid obesity with hyperphagia, and specific psychiatric phenotypes including cognitive and behavioural problems, particularly disruptive behaviours and frequent temper outbursts that preclude socialization. A deficit in oxytocin (OT)-producing neurons of the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus has been reported in these patients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 2% |
Germany | 2 | 2% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 126 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 16% |
Researcher | 16 | 12% |
Student > Master | 16 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
Other | 26 | 20% |
Unknown | 32 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 23% |
Psychology | 21 | 16% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 11% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 3% |
Other | 14 | 11% |
Unknown | 41 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2011.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#2,051
of 3,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,494
of 127,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#18
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,105 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,016 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.