↓ Skip to main content

Experimental infection of grey partridges with Bagaza virus: pathogenicity evaluation and potential role as a competent host

Overview of attention for article published in Veterinary Research, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Experimental infection of grey partridges with Bagaza virus: pathogenicity evaluation and potential role as a competent host
Published in
Veterinary Research, May 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13567-018-0536-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cristina Cano-Gómez, Francisco Llorente, Elisa Pérez-Ramírez, Ramón C. Soriguer, Mathieu Sarasa, Miguel Ángel Jiménez-Clavero

Abstract

Bagaza virus (BAGV; synonymous to Israel turkey meningoencephalomyelitis virus, ITV) is a relevant arthropod-borne epornitic flavivirus. In its first emergence in Europe (southern Spain, 2010) BAGV caused an outbreak, severely affecting red-legged partridges and common pheasants. The effects (pathogenicity, role as reservoir host) of BAGV in other European phasianids are unknown. To fill this gap, grey partridges were experimentally infected with BAGV. The clinical course of the disease was severe, with neurological signs, significant weight loss and 40% mortality. Low viral loads in the blood and the absence of contact transmission suggest a limited-if any-role on BAGV transmission for this European phasianid.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Student > Master 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 9 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 21%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 9 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2022.
All research outputs
#15,220,103
of 25,443,857 outputs
Outputs from Veterinary Research
#662
of 1,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,235
of 341,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Veterinary Research
#9
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,443,857 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,342 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,209 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.