↓ Skip to main content

Differential effects of dietary protein sources on postprandial low-grade inflammation after a single high fat meal in obese non-diabetic subjects

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
24 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
141 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Differential effects of dietary protein sources on postprandial low-grade inflammation after a single high fat meal in obese non-diabetic subjects
Published in
Nutrition Journal, October 2011
DOI 10.1186/1475-2891-10-115
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jens Holmer-Jensen, Toni Karhu, Lene S Mortensen, Steen B Pedersen, Karl-Heinz Herzig, Kjeld Hermansen

Abstract

Obesity is a state of chronic low-grade inflammation. Chronic low-grade inflammation is associated with the pathophysiology of both type-2 diabetes and atherosclerosis. Prevention or reduction of chronic low-grade inflammation may be advantageous in relation to obesity related co-morbidity. In this study we investigated the acute effect of dietary protein sources on postprandial low-grade inflammatory markers after a high-fat meal in obese non-diabetic subjects.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 135 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 14%
Researcher 18 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 11%
Student > Master 15 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 9%
Other 26 18%
Unknown 33 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 27 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 3%
Other 18 13%
Unknown 37 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2022.
All research outputs
#2,270,412
of 25,468,789 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#534
of 1,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,288
of 151,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#15
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,468,789 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,525 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,201 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.