↓ Skip to main content

Physical activity restriction in age-related eye disease: a cross-sectional study exploring fear of falling as a potential mediator

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Geriatrics, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Physical activity restriction in age-related eye disease: a cross-sectional study exploring fear of falling as a potential mediator
Published in
BMC Geriatrics, June 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12877-015-0062-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Angeline M. Nguyen, Karun S. Arora, Bonnielin K. Swenor, David S. Friedman, Pradeep Y. Ramulu

Abstract

Fear of falling (FoF) is predictive of decreased physical activity. This study sought to determine if FoF mediates the relationship between decreased vision and physical activity restriction in individuals with glaucoma and age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Accelerometers were used to measure physical activity over 1 week in 59 control, 83 glaucoma, and 58 AMD subjects. Subjects completed the University of Illinois at Chicago Fear of Falling Questionnaire, and the extent of FoF was estimated using Rasch analysis. In negative binomial models adjusting for demographic, health, and social factors, FoF was investigated as a potential mediator between the severity of visual field (VF) loss (in glaucoma patients) or the severity of contrast sensitivity (CS) loss (in AMD patients) and decreased engagement in physical activity, defined as minutes spent in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) per day. In multivariate negative binomial regression models, 5-decibels worse VF mean deviation was associated with 26 % less engagement in MVPA [rate ratio (RR) = 0.74, p < 0.01] amongst glaucoma subjects. When FoF was added to the model, the RR increased from 0.74 to 0.78, and VF loss severity remained associated with less MVPA at a statistically significant level (p < 0.01). Likewise, 0.1 log units worse CS was associated with 11 % less daily MVPA (RR = 0.89, p < 0.01) amongst AMD subjects. When FoF was added to the model, the RR increased from 0.89 to 1.02, and CS loss was no longer associated with MVPA at a statistically significant level (p = 0.53). FoF may mediate the relationship between vision loss and physical activity restriction amongst patients with AMD. Future work should determine optimal strategies for reducing FoF in individuals with vision loss in order to prevent the deleterious effects of physical activity restriction.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Unknown 81 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 18%
Researcher 12 14%
Student > Master 11 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 19 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 14%
Psychology 5 6%
Sports and Recreations 5 6%
Computer Science 3 4%
Other 14 17%
Unknown 23 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2015.
All research outputs
#15,338,777
of 22,815,414 outputs
Outputs from BMC Geriatrics
#2,339
of 3,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,161
of 264,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Geriatrics
#25
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,815,414 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,186 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,924 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.