You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A cohort study of the effectiveness of insecticide-treated bed nets to prevent malaria in an area of moderate pyrethroid resistance, Malawi
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Malaria Journal, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12936-015-0554-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kim A Lindblade, Dyson Mwandama, Themba Mzilahowa, Laura Steinhardt, John Gimnig, Monica Shah, Andy Bauleni, Jacklyn Wong, Ryan Wiegand, Paul Howell, John Zoya, John Chiphwanya, Don P Mathanga |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 333 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Malawi | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Mali | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Madagascar | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 326 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 58 | 17% |
| Researcher | 49 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 44 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 43 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 5% |
| Other | 58 | 17% |
| Unknown | 64 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 68 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 60 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 31 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 22 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 19 | 6% |
| Other | 59 | 18% |
| Unknown | 74 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2018.
All research outputs
#951,640
of 23,505,064 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#133
of 5,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,878
of 356,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#4
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,505,064 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,664 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,279 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.