↓ Skip to main content

The role of causal reasoning in understanding Simpson's paradox, Lord's paradox, and the suppression effect: covariate selection in the analysis of observational studies

Overview of attention for article published in Emerging Themes in Epidemiology, February 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#47 of 154)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The role of causal reasoning in understanding Simpson's paradox, Lord's paradox, and the suppression effect: covariate selection in the analysis of observational studies
Published in
Emerging Themes in Epidemiology, February 2008
DOI 10.1186/1742-7622-5-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Onyebuchi A Arah

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
United Kingdom 3 2%
Canada 2 1%
Belgium 2 1%
Germany 2 1%
Austria 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 127 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 26%
Researcher 24 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 15 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 8%
Other 11 8%
Other 27 19%
Unknown 16 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 20%
Psychology 18 13%
Social Sciences 15 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 10%
Computer Science 7 5%
Other 33 23%
Unknown 27 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2022.
All research outputs
#4,726,446
of 25,541,640 outputs
Outputs from Emerging Themes in Epidemiology
#47
of 154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,323
of 95,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Emerging Themes in Epidemiology
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,541,640 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 154 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,293 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.