↓ Skip to main content

Implementing mentor mothers in family practice to support abused mothers: Study protocol

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Primary Care, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Implementing mentor mothers in family practice to support abused mothers: Study protocol
Published in
BMC Primary Care, October 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2296-12-113
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maartje JW Loeffen, Sylvie H Lo Fo Wong, Fred PJF Wester, Miranda GH Laurant, Antoine LM Lagro-Janssen

Abstract

Intimate partner violence is highly prevalent and mostly affects women with negative consequences for their physical and mental health. Children often witness the violence which has negative consequences for their well-being too. Care offered by family physicians is often rejected because abused women experience a too high threshold. Mentor mother support, a low threshold intervention for abused mothers in family practice, proved to be feasible and effective in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. The primary aim of this study is to investigate which factors facilitate or hinder the implementation of mentor mother support in family practice. Besides we evaluate the effect of mentor mother support in a different region.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 85 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 17%
Student > Bachelor 12 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 12%
Researcher 6 7%
Other 5 6%
Other 15 17%
Unknown 23 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 21%
Psychology 17 20%
Social Sciences 9 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 24 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2014.
All research outputs
#2,231,711
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Primary Care
#251
of 2,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,084
of 150,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Primary Care
#4
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,359 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 150,856 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.