↓ Skip to main content

Is the Nintendo Wii Fit really acceptable to older people?: a discrete choice experiment

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Geriatrics, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
12 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
192 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Is the Nintendo Wii Fit really acceptable to older people?: a discrete choice experiment
Published in
BMC Geriatrics, October 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2318-11-64
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kate Laver, Julie Ratcliffe, Stacey George, Leonie Burgess, Maria Crotty

Abstract

Interactive video games such as the Nintendo Wii Fit are increasingly used as a therapeutic tool in health and aged care settings however, their acceptability to older people is unclear. The aim of this study was to determine the acceptability of the Nintendo Wii Fit as a therapy tool for hospitalised older people using a discrete choice experiment (DCE) before and after exposure to the intervention.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 7 4%
Netherlands 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 172 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 34 18%
Researcher 29 15%
Student > Master 25 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 10%
Other 36 19%
Unknown 27 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 11%
Sports and Recreations 17 9%
Psychology 13 7%
Social Sciences 12 6%
Other 43 22%
Unknown 41 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2012.
All research outputs
#1,652,382
of 23,596,168 outputs
Outputs from BMC Geriatrics
#333
of 3,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,049
of 141,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Geriatrics
#4
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,596,168 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,208 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,185 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.