↓ Skip to main content

Oesophageal foreign bodies in dogs: factors affecting success of endoscopic retrieval

Overview of attention for article published in Irish Veterinary Journal, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Oesophageal foreign bodies in dogs: factors affecting success of endoscopic retrieval
Published in
Irish Veterinary Journal, March 2010
DOI 10.1186/2046-0481-63-3-163
Pubmed ID
Authors

Florence Juvet, Manuel Pinilla, Robert E. Shiel, Carmel T. Mooney

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Peru 1 2%
Unknown 50 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 9 18%
Student > Bachelor 9 18%
Student > Master 8 16%
Other 7 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 7 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 26 51%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2011.
All research outputs
#14,599,159
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Irish Veterinary Journal
#98
of 257 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,409
of 102,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Irish Veterinary Journal
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 257 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,922 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them