↓ Skip to main content

Waiting for attention and care: birthing accounts of women in rural Tanzania who developed obstetric fistula as an outcome of labour

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
262 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Waiting for attention and care: birthing accounts of women in rural Tanzania who developed obstetric fistula as an outcome of labour
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, October 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2393-11-75
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lilian T Mselle, Thecla W Kohi, Abu Mvungi, Bjørg Evjen-Olsen, Karen Marie Moland

Abstract

Obstetric fistula is a physically and socially disabling obstetric complication that affects about 3,000 women in Tanzania every year. The fistula, an opening that forms between the vagina and the bladder and/or the rectum, is most frequently caused by unattended prolonged labour, often associated with delays in seeking and receiving appropriate and adequate birth care. Using the availability, accessibility, acceptability and quality of care (AAAQ) concept and the three delays model, this article provides empirical knowledge on birth care experiences of women who developed fistula after prolonged labour.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 262 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 257 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 64 24%
Researcher 24 9%
Student > Postgraduate 24 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 8%
Student > Bachelor 20 8%
Other 58 22%
Unknown 51 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 85 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 39 15%
Social Sciences 25 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 5%
Psychology 7 3%
Other 26 10%
Unknown 67 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2013.
All research outputs
#2,247,973
of 22,655,397 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#603
of 4,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,063
of 139,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#4
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,655,397 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,145 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 139,967 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.