You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Soy versus whey protein bars: Effects on exercise training impact on lean body mass and antioxidant status
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, December 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2891-3-22 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Erin C Brown, Robert A DiSilvestro, Ari Babaknia, Steven T Devor |
| Abstract |
Although soy protein may have many health benefits derived from its associated antioxidants, many male exercisers avoid soy protein. This is due partly to a popular, but untested notion that in males, soy is inferior to whey in promoting muscle weight gain. This study provided a direct comparison between a soy product and a whey product. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| Japan | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 6 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 89% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 197 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 46 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 12% |
| Researcher | 18 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 45 | 22% |
| Unknown | 43 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 47 | 23% |
| Sports and Recreations | 30 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 32 | 16% |
| Unknown | 46 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2024.
All research outputs
#4,491,401
of 25,907,102 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#760
of 1,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,655
of 153,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,907,102 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,534 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.5. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 153,678 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.