↓ Skip to main content

Traditional Chinese medicines in the treatment of hepatocellular cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research, August 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Traditional Chinese medicines in the treatment of hepatocellular cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research, August 2009
DOI 10.1186/1756-9966-28-112
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ping Wu, Jean Jacques Dugoua, Oghenowede Eyawo, Edward J Mills

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 48 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 22%
Researcher 8 16%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Other 4 8%
Other 13 26%
Unknown 4 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 48%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 16%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Chemistry 2 4%
Arts and Humanities 2 4%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 5 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2015.
All research outputs
#9,990,098
of 12,480,907 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
#416
of 768 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,525
of 233,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,480,907 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 768 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,588 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them