↓ Skip to main content

Changes in endotracheal tube cuff pressure in mechanically ventilated adult patients

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Intensive Care, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Changes in endotracheal tube cuff pressure in mechanically ventilated adult patients
Published in
Journal of Intensive Care, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/2052-0492-2-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Asuka Motoyama, Shota Asai, Hiroyuki Konami, Yuri Matsumoto, Takuyo Misumi, Hideaki Imanaka, Masaji Nishimura

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 3 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 17%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Other 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Other 5 28%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 56%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 22%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Engineering 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2015.
All research outputs
#15,309,686
of 19,789,905 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Intensive Care
#356
of 453 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,375
of 243,006 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Intensive Care
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,789,905 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 453 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,006 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them