↓ Skip to main content

Factors associated with the exposure of vaccines to adverse temperature conditions: the case of North West region, Cameroon

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Factors associated with the exposure of vaccines to adverse temperature conditions: the case of North West region, Cameroon
Published in
BMC Research Notes, June 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13104-015-1257-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin Ndinakie Yakum, Jérôme Ateudjieu, Fida Ramsina Pélagie, Ebile Akoh Walter, Pierre Watcho

Abstract

Adverse temperature recording in vaccine's cold chain is a major issue worldwide and this condition is known to compromise the quality of vaccines very rapidly. In Cameroon, with tropical climate, vaccines exposure to abnormal temperatures is very common. This study was conducted to identify factors associated to abnormal temperature recording in cold chain in the North West region. A total of 65 vaccinating health facilities were visited for the study from eight health districts. Concerning type of health facility, 48 (73.8%) of the health facilities were governmental facilities. About 50 (76.0%) of the facilities had a functional thermometer. Among the 50 health facilities with functional thermometer, abnormal temperatures were registered in 10 (20%) health facilities during data collection and 12 (24%) in the 2 months preceding collection. Factor significantly associated with abnormal temperature recording was the absence of an alternative power source (OR = 6.5, p = 0.03). The absence of an alternative source of power was significantly associated with abnormal temperature exposure in the 2 months preceding data collection. To improve on the quality of vaccines administered in North West region, each vaccinating health facility must have at least two sources of power supply.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 85 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 36%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 13%
Student > Postgraduate 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Researcher 4 5%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 18 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 13 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 12%
Engineering 9 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 6%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 23 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2017.
All research outputs
#12,812,018
of 22,816,807 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#1,512
of 4,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,519
of 262,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#22
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,816,807 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,262 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,924 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.