You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Annexin A1 expression in a pooled breast cancer series: association with tumor subtypes and prognosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, July 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12916-015-0392-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marcelo Sobral-Leite, Jelle Wesseling, Vincent T. H. B. M. Smit, Heli Nevanlinna, Martine H. van Miltenburg, Joyce Sanders, Ingrid Hofland, Fiona M. Blows, Penny Coulson, Gazinska Patrycja, Jan H. M. Schellens, Rainer Fagerholm, Päivi Heikkilä, Kristiina Aittomäki, Carl Blomqvist, Elena Provenzano, Hamid Raza Ali, Jonine Figueroa, Mark Sherman, Jolanta Lissowska, Arto Mannermaa, Vesa Kataja, Veli-Matti Kosma, Jaana M. Hartikainen, Kelly-Anne Phillips, kConFab/AOCS Investigators, Fergus J. Couch, Janet E. Olson, Celine Vachon, Daniel Visscher, Hermann Brenner, Katja Butterbach, Volker Arndt, Bernd Holleczek, Maartje J. Hooning, Antoinette Hollestelle, John W. M. Martens, Carolien H. M. van Deurzen, Bob van de Water, Annegien Broeks, Jenny Chang-Claude, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, Douglas F. Easton, Paul D. P. Pharoah, Montserrat García-Closas, Marjo de Graauw, Marjanka K. Schmidt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 95 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 11% |
| Professor | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 20 | 21% |
| Unknown | 18 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 14% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Unknown | 20 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2015.
All research outputs
#3,555,467
of 22,816,807 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#1,885
of 3,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,548
of 263,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#45
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,816,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,425 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.5. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,464 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.