↓ Skip to main content

Advancing environmental risk assessment for transgenic biofeedstock crops

Overview of attention for article published in Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts, November 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Advancing environmental risk assessment for transgenic biofeedstock crops
Published in
Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts, November 2009
DOI 10.1186/1754-6834-2-27
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeffrey D Wolt

Abstract

Transgenic modification of plants is a key enabling technology for developing sustainable biofeedstocks for biofuels production. Regulatory decisions and the wider acceptance and development of transgenic biofeedstock crops are considered from the context of science-based risk assessment. The risk assessment paradigm for transgenic biofeedstock crops is fundamentally no different from that of current generation transgenic crops, except that the focus of the assessment must consider the unique attributes of a given biofeedstock crop and its environmental release. For currently envisioned biofeedstock crops, particular emphasis in risk assessment will be given to characterization of altered metabolic profiles and their implications relative to non-target environmental effects and food safety; weediness and invasiveness when plants are modified for abiotic stress tolerance or are domesticated; and aggregate risk when plants are platforms for multi-product production. Robust risk assessments for transgenic biofeedstock crops are case-specific, initiated through problem formulation, and use tiered approaches for risk characterization.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Indonesia 2 3%
France 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 55 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 20%
Student > Master 12 18%
Student > Postgraduate 5 8%
Other 5 8%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 5 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 52%
Environmental Science 7 11%
Engineering 5 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 10 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2013.
All research outputs
#5,446,629
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts
#318
of 1,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,642
of 108,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,578 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,263 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them