↓ Skip to main content

Understanding and improving access to prompt and effective malaria treatment and care in rural Tanzania: the ACCESS Programme

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, June 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
193 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Understanding and improving access to prompt and effective malaria treatment and care in rural Tanzania: the ACCESS Programme
Published in
Malaria Journal, June 2007
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-6-83
Pubmed ID
Authors

Manuel W Hetzel, Nelly Iteba, Ahmed Makemba, Christopher Mshana, Christian Lengeler, Brigit Obrist, Alexander Schulze, Rose Nathan, Angel Dillip, Sandra Alba, Iddy Mayumana, Rashid A Khatib, Joseph D Njau, Hassan Mshinda

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Uganda 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Malawi 1 <1%
Unknown 187 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 16%
Researcher 28 15%
Student > Bachelor 13 7%
Student > Postgraduate 9 5%
Other 36 19%
Unknown 34 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 28%
Social Sciences 30 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 3%
Other 25 13%
Unknown 41 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2017.
All research outputs
#7,795,929
of 23,674,309 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#2,497
of 5,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,114
of 69,352 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#9
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,674,309 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,674 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,352 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.