↓ Skip to main content

Hypoxia-inducible MiR-182 promotes angiogenesis by targeting RASA1 in hepatocellular carcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hypoxia-inducible MiR-182 promotes angiogenesis by targeting RASA1 in hepatocellular carcinoma
Published in
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research, June 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13046-015-0182-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chengli Du, Xiaoyu Weng, Wendi Hu, Zhen Lv, Heng Xiao, Chaofeng Ding, Owusu-anash K. Gyabaah, Haiyang Xie, Lin Zhou, Jian Wu, Shusen Zheng

Abstract

Hypoxia is a common feature of solid tumors, including HCC. And hypoxia has been reported to play an important role in HCC progression. However, the potential mechanism of miRNAs in hypoxia mediating HCC progression still remains unclear. The HCC cells were cultured in the atmosphere of 1 % oxygen to induce hypoxia. The microRNA microarray was employed to search for the hypoxia-inducible miRNAs. RT-PCR, western blot and immunohistochemistry were used to detect the RNA and protein levels. HUVEC were applied to explore the angiogenesis level. We found that miR-182 was upregulated in the hypoxia-based microarray. We then revealed that miR-182 was also significantly increased in the HCC tissues compared to the corresponding normal tissues. In vitro capilliary tube formation assays showed that the miR-182 promoted angiogenesis. RASA1 was demonstrated as the direct target of miR-182. In addition, the suppression of RASA1 phenocopied the pro-angiogenesis effects of miR-182. Besides, RASA1 was also decreased in the hypoxia HCC cells while the inhibition of miR-182 partially restored the level of RASA1. Our data showed that hypoxia regulated the expression of miR-182 and RASA1 to promote HCC angiogenesis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 19%
Student > Postgraduate 3 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 7 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 19%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 7%
Unknown 8 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2016.
All research outputs
#19,944,091
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
#1,461
of 2,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,547
of 277,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
#16
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,378 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,850 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.