↓ Skip to main content

Erratum: Accuracy of microRNAs as markers for the detection of neck lymph node metastases in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Erratum: Accuracy of microRNAs as markers for the detection of neck lymph node metastases in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
Published in
BMC Medicine, July 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12916-015-0406-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ana Carolina de Carvalho, Cristovam Scapulatempo-Neto, Danielle Calheiros Campelo Maia, Adriane Feijó Evangelista, Mariana Andozia Morini, André Lopes Carvalho, André Luiz Vettore

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 50%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 17%
Student > Postgraduate 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 67%
Chemistry 1 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2015.
All research outputs
#18,418,694
of 22,816,807 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#3,199
of 3,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,241
of 263,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#71
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,816,807 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,425 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.5. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,437 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.