↓ Skip to main content

Loop-mediated isothermal amplification assays for screening of bacterial integrons

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Research, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Loop-mediated isothermal amplification assays for screening of bacterial integrons
Published in
Biological Research, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/0717-6287-47-53
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guangchao Yu, Lei Chen, Chii-wann Lin, Bing Li, Hemiao Cui, Siyi Chen, Jian Miao, Huawei Bian, Dingqiang Chen, Yang Deng

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 2%
Costa Rica 1 2%
Unknown 44 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 15%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Professor 4 9%
Student > Master 3 7%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 9 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 9%
Engineering 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 13 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2015.
All research outputs
#16,722,190
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Biological Research
#286
of 642 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,773
of 265,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Research
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 642 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,588 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.