You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Acetylcholine receptor antagonists in acute respiratory distress syndrome: much more than muscle relaxants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-018-1979-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Diana Jansen, Heder de Vries, Leo M. A. Heunks |
| Abstract |
Acetylcholine receptor antagonists have been shown to improve outcome in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. However, it is incompletely understood how these agents improve outcome. In the current editorial, we discuss the mechanisms of action of acetylcholine receptor antagonists beyond neuromuscular blockade. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 4 | 11% |
| United States | 4 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 8% |
| France | 2 | 5% |
| Australia | 2 | 5% |
| Mexico | 2 | 5% |
| Argentina | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Philippines | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 13 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 32 | 84% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
| Scientists | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 6 | 29% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 19% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 10% |
| Researcher | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 67% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 4 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2020.
All research outputs
#1,702,234
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,499
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,686
of 343,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#48
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,970 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.