↓ Skip to main content

Neonatal non-contact respiratory monitoring based on real-time infrared thermography

Overview of attention for article published in BioMedical Engineering OnLine, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
166 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
242 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neonatal non-contact respiratory monitoring based on real-time infrared thermography
Published in
BioMedical Engineering OnLine, October 2011
DOI 10.1186/1475-925x-10-93
Pubmed ID
Authors

Abbas K Abbas, Konrad Heimann, Katrin Jergus, Thorsten Orlikowsky, Steffen Leonhardt

Abstract

Monitoring of vital parameters is an important topic in neonatal daily care. Progress in computational intelligence and medical sensors has facilitated the development of smart bedside monitors that can integrate multiple parameters into a single monitoring system. This paper describes non-contact monitoring of neonatal vital signals based on infrared thermography as a new biomedical engineering application. One signal of clinical interest is the spontaneous respiration rate of the neonate. It will be shown that the respiration rate of neonates can be monitored based on analysis of the anterior naris (nostrils) temperature profile associated with the inspiration and expiration phases successively.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 242 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Lithuania 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 230 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 19%
Student > Master 38 16%
Student > Bachelor 29 12%
Researcher 27 11%
Other 16 7%
Other 48 20%
Unknown 38 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 102 42%
Medicine and Dentistry 33 14%
Computer Science 18 7%
Physics and Astronomy 8 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Other 31 13%
Unknown 46 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2022.
All research outputs
#6,929,769
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BioMedical Engineering OnLine
#170
of 867 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,563
of 151,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioMedical Engineering OnLine
#6
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 867 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,225 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.