You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
What is the available evidence concerning relative performance of different designs of mixed-species plantings for smallholder and community forestry in the tropics? A systematic map protocol
|
---|---|
Published in |
Environmental Evidence, July 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13750-015-0041-8 |
Authors |
Huong Nguyen, John Herbohn, Jessica Clendenning, David Lamb, Wolfram Dressler, Jerry Vanclay, Jennifer Firn |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
United States | 1 | 14% |
Indonesia | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 43 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 14 | 31% |
Researcher | 8 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 11% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Professor | 3 | 7% |
Other | 7 | 16% |
Unknown | 5 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 17 | 38% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 27% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 7% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 4% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 8 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2015.
All research outputs
#6,073,404
of 22,816,807 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#189
of 300 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,034
of 263,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,816,807 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 300 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,437 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.