↓ Skip to main content

The phenomenon of co-morbid physical and mental illness in acute medical care: the lived experience of Australian health professionals

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The phenomenon of co-morbid physical and mental illness in acute medical care: the lived experience of Australian health professionals
Published in
BMC Research Notes, July 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13104-015-1264-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jo-Ann Giandinoto, Karen-leigh Edward

Abstract

An estimated 30-50% of patients admitted to acute medical care settings experience co-morbid physical and mental illness. Research suggests that health professionals in these settings find managing this patient group challenging. A number of studies have investigated health professional's attitudes and perceptions however there is limited research that investigates the lived experience in a current Australian healthcare context. The aim of this study was to explicate an in-depth description of the health professional's experience when caring for patients experiencing co-morbid physical and mental illness in Australian acute medical care settings. A phenomenological design was undertaken with six participants representing nursing and medical disciplines. In 2013-2014 one-on-one semi-structured interviews were used and the data collected underwent thematic analysis using an extended version of Colaizzi's phenomenological inquiry. Six themes emerged including-challenging behaviours, environmental and organisational factors, lack of skills, knowledge and experience, hyper-vigilance and anxiety, duty of care and negative attitudes with an overarching theme of fear of the unknown. Staff in acute medical care settings were unsure of patients with mental illness and described them as unpredictable, identifying that they lacked requisite mental health literacy. Regular training is advocated.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 105 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 20 19%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Student > Master 8 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 7%
Student > Postgraduate 4 4%
Other 17 16%
Unknown 37 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 42 40%
Psychology 9 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 6%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 <1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 41 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2015.
All research outputs
#21,264,673
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#3,616
of 4,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#224,678
of 264,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#70
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,300 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,667 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.