↓ Skip to main content

Bioactive properties and clinical safety of a novel milk protein peptide

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bioactive properties and clinical safety of a novel milk protein peptide
Published in
Nutrition Journal, September 2011
DOI 10.1186/1475-2891-10-99
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard B Kreider, Mike Iosia, Matt Cooke, Geoffrey Hudson, Chris Rasmussen, Helen Chen, Olof Mollstedt, Men-Hwei Tsai

Abstract

Milk protein fractions and peptides have been shown to have bioactive properties. This preliminary study examined the potential mechanisms of action and clinical safety of novel milk protein peptide (MP).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 3%
Unknown 64 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 21%
Student > Bachelor 9 14%
Student > Master 9 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 14%
Professor 7 11%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 10 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 11%
Sports and Recreations 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 16 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2015.
All research outputs
#6,764,822
of 12,482,069 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#748
of 1,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,563
of 105,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#70
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,482,069 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,042 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.5. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,475 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.