You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Response to: the nature of evidence for and against epigenetic inheritance
|
---|---|
Published in |
Genome Biology, July 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13059-015-0714-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Piroska E. Szabó |
Abstract |
We thank Dr. Nadeau for his interest in our work. Dr. Nadeau has raised concerns about the experimental approach (mouse strains, route of administration, lack of phenotypic assessment) and about the validity of our conclusions. We will respond to each of these concerns point-by point.Please see related article: www.dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13059-015-0709-y. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
Canada | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
Mexico | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 17 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 21% |
Researcher | 4 | 21% |
Student > Master | 2 | 11% |
Professor | 1 | 5% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 6 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 47% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 16% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 5 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2015.
All research outputs
#15,739,010
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#3,967
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,263
of 277,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#60
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,374 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.