↓ Skip to main content

QUALICOPC, a multi-country study evaluating quality, costs and equity in primary care

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Primary Care, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
linkedin
1 LinkedIn user

Citations

dimensions_citation
146 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
223 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
QUALICOPC, a multi-country study evaluating quality, costs and equity in primary care
Published in
BMC Primary Care, October 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2296-12-115
Pubmed ID
Authors

Willemijn LA Schäfer, Wienke GW Boerma, Dionne S Kringos, Jan De Maeseneer, Stefan Greß, Stephanie Heinemann, Danica Rotar-Pavlic, Chiara Seghieri, Igor Švab, Michael J Van den Berg, Milena Vainieri, Gert P Westert, Sara Willems, Peter P Groenewegen

Abstract

The QUALICOPC (Quality and Costs of Primary Care in Europe) study aims to evaluate the performance of primary care systems in Europe in terms of quality, equity and costs. The study will provide an answer to the question what strong primary care systems entail and which effects primary care systems have on the performance of health care systems. QUALICOPC is funded by the European Commission under the "Seventh Framework Programme". In this article the background and design of the QUALICOPC study is described.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 223 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 216 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 17%
Researcher 36 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 12%
Other 18 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 8%
Other 45 20%
Unknown 43 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 100 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 8%
Social Sciences 16 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 9 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 3%
Other 24 11%
Unknown 51 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2020.
All research outputs
#4,582,837
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from BMC Primary Care
#633
of 2,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,276
of 151,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Primary Care
#7
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,359 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,221 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.