↓ Skip to main content

Effect of fruit and vegetable concentrates on endothelial function in metabolic syndrome: A randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of fruit and vegetable concentrates on endothelial function in metabolic syndrome: A randomized controlled trial
Published in
Nutrition Journal, June 2011
DOI 10.1186/1475-2891-10-72
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ather Ali, Yuka Yazaki, Valentine Y Njike, Yingying Ma, David L Katz

Abstract

Dehydrated fruit and vegetable concentrates provide an accessible form of phytonutrient supplementation that may offer cardioprotective effects. This study assessed the effects of two blends of encapsulated juice powder concentrates (with and without added berry powders) on endothelial function in persons with metabolic syndrome, a risk factor for type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Denmark 1 1%
Indonesia 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Lebanon 1 1%
Unknown 81 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 15%
Student > Master 11 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Researcher 7 8%
Other 15 17%
Unknown 13 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 11%
Sports and Recreations 6 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 6%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 17 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2017.
All research outputs
#1,448,092
of 17,355,315 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#392
of 1,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,923
of 120,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#32
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,355,315 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,287 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,261 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.