You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Health-related quality of life after TBI: a systematic review of study design, instruments, measurement properties, and outcome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Population Health Metrics, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12963-015-0037-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Suzanne Polinder, Juanita A Haagsma, David van Klaveren, Ewout W Steyerberg, Ed F van Beeck |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | 40% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 20% |
| Australia | 1 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 174 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 28 | 16% |
| Researcher | 25 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 9% |
| Other | 32 | 18% |
| Unknown | 37 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 26% |
| Psychology | 34 | 19% |
| Neuroscience | 17 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 7% |
| Unknown | 46 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2019.
All research outputs
#2,748,698
of 22,817,213 outputs
Outputs from Population Health Metrics
#71
of 392 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,676
of 255,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Population Health Metrics
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,817,213 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 392 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,114 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.