↓ Skip to main content

Thirty years after Alma-Ata: a systematic review of the impact of community health workers delivering curative interventions against malaria, pneumonia and diarrhoea on child mortality and morbidity…

Overview of attention for article published in Human Resources for Health, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
168 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
419 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Thirty years after Alma-Ata: a systematic review of the impact of community health workers delivering curative interventions against malaria, pneumonia and diarrhoea on child mortality and morbidity in sub-Saharan Africa
Published in
Human Resources for Health, October 2011
DOI 10.1186/1478-4491-9-27
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jason B Christopher, Alex Le May, Simon Lewin, David A Ross

Abstract

Over thirty years have passed since the Alma-Ata Declaration on primary health care in 1978. Many governments in the first decade following the declaration responded by developing national programmes of community health workers (CHWs), but evaluations of these often demonstrated poor outcomes. As many CHW programmes have responded to the HIV/AIDS pandemic, international interest in them has returned and their role in the response to other diseases should be examined carefully so that lessons can be applied to their new roles. Over half of the deaths in African children under five years of age are due to malaria, diarrhoea and pneumonia - a situation which could be addressed through the use of cheap and effective interventions delivered by CHWs. However, to date there is very little evidence from randomised controlled trials of the impacts of CHW programmes on child mortality in Africa. Evidence from non-randomised controlled studies has not previously been reviewed systematically.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 419 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Sierra Leone 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
Niger 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 408 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 88 21%
Researcher 60 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 11%
Lecturer 30 7%
Student > Postgraduate 26 6%
Other 105 25%
Unknown 62 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 143 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 61 15%
Social Sciences 59 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 16 4%
Other 47 11%
Unknown 77 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2021.
All research outputs
#939,310
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Human Resources for Health
#64
of 1,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,805
of 152,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Resources for Health
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,267 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,812 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.