↓ Skip to main content

Exposure to arsenic in drinking water is associated with increased prevalence of diabetes: a cross-sectional study in the Zimapán and Lagunera regions in Mexico

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Health, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
196 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
177 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exposure to arsenic in drinking water is associated with increased prevalence of diabetes: a cross-sectional study in the Zimapán and Lagunera regions in Mexico
Published in
Environmental Health, August 2011
DOI 10.1186/1476-069x-10-73
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luz M Del Razo, Gonzalo G García-Vargas, Olga L Valenzuela, Erika Hernández Castellanos, Luz C Sánchez-Peña, Jenna M Currier, Zuzana Drobná, Dana Loomis, Miroslav Stýblo

Abstract

Human exposures to inorganic arsenic (iAs) have been linked to an increased risk of diabetes mellitus. Recent laboratory studies showed that methylated trivalent metabolites of iAs may play key roles in the diabetogenic effects of iAs. Our study examined associations between chronic exposure to iAs in drinking water, metabolism of iAs, and prevalence of diabetes in arsenicosis-endemic areas of Mexico.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 3 2%
United States 2 1%
Spain 2 1%
Peru 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Unknown 167 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 40 23%
Researcher 25 14%
Student > Bachelor 25 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Other 29 16%
Unknown 26 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 21%
Environmental Science 25 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 12%
Chemistry 11 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 5%
Other 36 20%
Unknown 37 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2018.
All research outputs
#1,624,089
of 22,655,397 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Health
#324
of 1,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,843
of 123,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Health
#5
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,655,397 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,477 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,977 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.