↓ Skip to main content

Wolbachia in butterflies and moths: geographic structure in infection frequency

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Zoology, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Wolbachia in butterflies and moths: geographic structure in infection frequency
Published in
Frontiers in Zoology, July 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12983-015-0107-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Muhammad Z. Ahmed, Eli V. Araujo-Jnr, John J. Welch, Akito Y. Kawahara

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 150 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 27 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 13%
Student > Master 16 10%
Researcher 14 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 3%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 57 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 14%
Environmental Science 11 7%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 <1%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 66 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2020.
All research outputs
#5,310,838
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Zoology
#267
of 706 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,898
of 279,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Zoology
#6
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 706 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,797 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.