↓ Skip to main content

Blocking a vicious cycle nNOS/peroxynitrite/AMPK by S-nitrosoglutathione: implication for stroke therapy

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Neuroscience, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Blocking a vicious cycle nNOS/peroxynitrite/AMPK by S-nitrosoglutathione: implication for stroke therapy
Published in
BMC Neuroscience, July 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12868-015-0179-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mushfiquddin Khan, Tajinder S Dhammu, Fumiyo Matsuda, Avtar K Singh, Inderjit Singh

Abstract

Stroke immediately sets into motion sustained excitotoxicity and calcium dysregulation, causing aberrant activity in neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS) and an imbalance in the levels of nitric oxide (NO). Drugs targeting nNOS-originated toxicity may therefore reduce stroke-induced damage. Recently, we observed that a redox-modulating agent of the NO metabolome, S-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO), confers neurovascular protection by reducing the levels of peroxynitrite, a product of aberrant NOS activity. We therefore investigated whether GSNO-mediated neuroprotection and improved neurological functions depend on blocking nNOS/peroxynitrite-associated injurious mechanisms using a rat model of cerebral ischemia reperfusion (IR). IR increased the activity of nNOS, the levels of neuronal peroxynitrite and phosphorylation at Ser(1412) of nNOS. GSNO treatment of IR animals decreased IR-activated nNOS activity and neuronal peroxynitrite levels by reducing nNOS phosphorylation at Ser(1412). The Ser(1412) phosphorylation is associated with increased nNOS activity. Supporting the notion that nNOS activity and peroxynitrite are deleterious following IR, inhibition of nNOS by its inhibitor 7-nitroindazole or reducing peroxynitrite by its scavenger FeTPPS decreased IR injury. GSNO also decreased the activation of AMP Kinase (AMPK) and its upstream kinase LKB1, both of which were activated in IR brain. AMPK has been implicated in nNOS activation via Ser(1412) phosphorylation. To determine whether AMPK activation is deleterious in the acute phase of IR, we treated animals after IR with AICAR (an AMPK activator) and compound c (an AMPK inhibitor). While AICAR potentiated, compound c reduced the IR injury. Taken together, these results indicate an injurious nNOS/peroxynitrite/AMPK cycle following stroke, and GSNO treatment of IR inhibits this vicious cycle, resulting in neuroprotection and improved neurological function. GSNO is a natural component of the human body, and its exogenous administration to humans is not associated with any known side effects. Currently, the FDA-approved thrombolytic therapy suffers from a lack of neuronal protective activity. Because GSNO provides neuroprotection by ameliorating stroke's initial and causative injuries, it is a candidate of translational value for stroke therapy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 32 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Other 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Other 8 24%
Unknown 6 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 21%
Neuroscience 6 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 7 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2021.
All research outputs
#13,207,948
of 22,817,213 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neuroscience
#529
of 1,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,941
of 262,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neuroscience
#8
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,817,213 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,244 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,607 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.