↓ Skip to main content

Resistance to cancer chemotherapy: failure in drug response from ADME to P-gp

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Cell International, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#23 of 2,291)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
15 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
462 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
702 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Resistance to cancer chemotherapy: failure in drug response from ADME to P-gp
Published in
Cancer Cell International, July 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12935-015-0221-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Khalid O Alfarouk, Christian-Martin Stock, Sophie Taylor, Megan Walsh, Abdel Khalig Muddathir, Daniel Verduzco, Adil H H Bashir, Osama Y Mohammed, Gamal O Elhassan, Salvador Harguindey, Stephan J Reshkin, Muntaser E Ibrahim, Cyril Rauch

Abstract

Cancer chemotherapy resistance (MDR) is the innate and/or acquired ability of cancer cells to evade the effects of chemotherapeutics and is one of the most pressing major dilemmas in cancer therapy. Chemotherapy resistance can arise due to several host or tumor-related factors. However, most current research is focused on tumor-specific factors and specifically genes that handle expression of pumps that efflux accumulated drugs inside malignantly transformed types of cells. In this work, we suggest a wider and alternative perspective that sets the stage for a future platform in modifying drug resistance with respect to the treatment of cancer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 702 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 696 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 103 15%
Student > Master 96 14%
Student > Bachelor 90 13%
Researcher 51 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 32 5%
Other 84 12%
Unknown 246 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 152 22%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 59 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 53 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 50 7%
Chemistry 49 7%
Other 72 10%
Unknown 267 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,757,033
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Cell International
#23
of 2,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,540
of 278,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Cell International
#1
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,291 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,676 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.