↓ Skip to main content

Pregnant or recently pregnant opioid users: contraception decisions, perceptions and preferences

Overview of attention for article published in Contraception and Reproductive Medicine, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#24 of 101)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pregnant or recently pregnant opioid users: contraception decisions, perceptions and preferences
Published in
Contraception and Reproductive Medicine, March 2018
DOI 10.1186/s40834-018-0056-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rebecca L. Fischbein, Bethany G. Lanese, Lynn Falletta, Kelsey Hamilton, Jennifer A. King, Deric R. Kenne

Abstract

Multiple factors are linked to extremely high unintended pregnancy rates among women who use opioids, including various barriers to contraception adherence. These include patient level barriers such as lack of knowledge and education about highly effective contraception, and potential provider barriers. Using a mixed-methods framework to examine the contraception-related perceptions and preferences of opioid using women is a necessary next step to understanding this phenomenon. A mixed-method study was conducted which included both self-report questionnaires along with a semi-structured qualitative interview of opioid-using pregnant or recently pregnant women in two drug treatment facilities in Ohio. Forty-two women completed the study. The majority of recent (75%) and total pregnancies were unintended. Male condoms were reported as the highest form of lifetime contraception used within the present sample (69%). Participants reported low lifetime use of long acting reversible contraception (LARC) (ranging from 5 to 12%). Participants preferred hormonal injections first (40%), followed by IUDs (17%). Reasons for preferences of injections and LARC were similar: not needing to remember, side effects, and long-term effectiveness. Most of the study population participants stated they would utilize contraception, particularly Tier 1 LARC methods, if freely available; however, high rates of unintended pregnancy were observed in this sample. This indicates the need for contraception education, and addressing the procedural, logistical and economic barriers that may be preventing the use of LARC among this population.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 19%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 21 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Social Sciences 4 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 24 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2022.
All research outputs
#6,651,629
of 24,224,854 outputs
Outputs from Contraception and Reproductive Medicine
#24
of 101 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,256
of 333,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Contraception and Reproductive Medicine
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,224,854 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,941 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.