↓ Skip to main content

Preoperatively diagnosed ductal cancers in situ of the breast presenting as even small masses are of high risk for the invasive cancer foci in postoperative specimen

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Surgical Oncology, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Preoperatively diagnosed ductal cancers in situ of the breast presenting as even small masses are of high risk for the invasive cancer foci in postoperative specimen
Published in
World Journal of Surgical Oncology, July 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12957-015-0641-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bartlomiej Szynglarewicz, Piotr Kasprzak, Agnieszka Halon, Rafal Matkowski

Abstract

In ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast (DCIS), histologic diagnosis obtained before the definitive treatment is related to the risk of underestimation if the presence of invasive cancer is found postoperatively. These patients need a second operation to assess the nodal status. We evaluated the upstaging rate in patients with mass-forming DCIS. Sixty-three women with pure DCIS presenting as sonographic mass lesion underwent vacuum-assisted or core-needle biopsy and subsequent surgery. Rates of postoperative upstaging to invasive cancer were calculated and compared with clinical character and size of DCIS. Median age of patients (range) was 63 years (27-88) while median diameter of DCIS was 11 mm (6-60). Fifty-six percent of DCIS were upstaged. Patient age did not differ significantly between groups with and without final invasion (median, mean, SD): 63, 61.4, 12.5 vs 62, 61.2, 10.6 years, respectively (P = 0.659). The difference of DCIS size between these groups was statistically important (median, mean, SD): 13, 17.3, 11.4 vs 9.5, 9.8, 3.2 mm, respectively (P = 0.0003). Mass size and palpability were significant risk factors (P < 0.001 and P < 0.01, respectively). Rate of underestimation for mass with diameter ≤10 mm, 10-20 mm and >20 mm was 37, 64 and 91 %, respectively. DCIS diagnosed on minimal-invasive biopsy of even small sonographic mass is of high risk for the upstaging to invasive cancer after final surgical excision. In these patients, subsequent intervention is needed for nodal status assessment. They are good candidates for the sentinel node biopsy during the breast operation to avoid multi-step surgery.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Slovakia 1 5%
Unknown 18 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 16%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Professor 1 5%
Other 3 16%
Unknown 6 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 58%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%
Unknown 6 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2021.
All research outputs
#6,957,935
of 22,817,213 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#202
of 2,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,067
of 262,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#9
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,817,213 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,043 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.