Title |
Purchasing and Using Personal Emergency Response Systems (PERS): how decisions are made by community-dwelling seniors in Canada
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Geriatrics, July 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12877-015-0079-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Alexandra C. McKenna, Marita Kloseck, Richard Crilly, Jan Polgar |
Abstract |
As the demographic of older people continues to grow, health services that support independence among community-dwelling seniors have become increasingly important. Personal Emergency Response Systems (PERS) are medical alert systems, designed to serve as a safety net for seniors living alone. Health care professionals often recommend that seniors in danger of falls or other medical emergencies obtain a PERS. The purpose of the study was to investigate the experience of seniors living with and using a PERS in their daily lives, using a qualitative grounded theory approach. Five focus groups and 10 semi-structured interviews, with a total of 30 participants, were completed using a grounded theory approach. All participants were PERS subscribers over the age of 80, living alone in a naturally occurring retirement community (NORC) with high health service utilization in a major urban centre in Ontario. Constant comparative analysis was used to develop themes and ultimately a model of why and how seniors obtain and use the PERS. Two core themes, unpredictability and decision-making around PERS activation, emerged as major features of the theoretical model. Being able to get help and the psychological value of PERS informed the context of living with a PERS. A number of theoretical conclusions related to unpredictability and the decision-making process around activating PERS were generated. |
Twitter Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 2% |
Singapore | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 58 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 15% |
Student > Master | 8 | 13% |
Researcher | 8 | 13% |
Librarian | 4 | 7% |
Other | 4 | 7% |
Other | 11 | 18% |
Unknown | 16 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 17% |
Psychology | 7 | 12% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 8% |
Engineering | 4 | 7% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 5% |
Other | 13 | 22% |
Unknown | 18 | 30% |