You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF): properties and frontier of current knowledge
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of General Psychiatry, May 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1744-859x-9-20 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
IH Monrad Aas |
| Abstract |
Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) is well known internationally and widely used for scoring the severity of illness in psychiatry. Problems with GAF show a need for its further development (for example validity and reliability problems). The aim of the present study was to identify gaps in current knowledge about properties of GAF that are of interest for further development. Properties of GAF are defined as characteristic traits or attributes that serve to define GAF (or may have a role to define a future updated GAF). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 238 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 233 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 17% |
| Researcher | 37 | 16% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 28 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 11% |
| Other | 21 | 9% |
| Other | 42 | 18% |
| Unknown | 43 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 75 | 32% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 65 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 10 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 19 | 8% |
| Unknown | 50 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2021.
All research outputs
#1,633,600
of 22,953,506 outputs
Outputs from Annals of General Psychiatry
#47
of 512 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,641
of 95,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of General Psychiatry
#1
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,953,506 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 512 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,746 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.