You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Disparities in the frequency of fruit and vegetable consumption by socio-demographic and lifestyle characteristics in Canada
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nutrition Journal, October 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/1475-2891-10-118 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sunday Azagba, Mesbah F Sharaf |
Abstract |
The health benefits of adequate fruit and vegetable (F&V) consumption are significant and widely documented. However, many individuals self-report low F&V consumption frequency per day. This paper examines the disparities in the frequency of F&V consumption by socio-demographic and lifestyle characteristics. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Benin | 1 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 106 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 24 | 22% |
Student > Bachelor | 17 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 11% |
Researcher | 11 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 8% |
Other | 17 | 16% |
Unknown | 18 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 20% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 18% |
Social Sciences | 17 | 16% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
Other | 15 | 14% |
Unknown | 26 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2012.
All research outputs
#6,375,523
of 22,655,397 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#855
of 1,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,887
of 140,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#26
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,655,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,421 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.0. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 140,376 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.