↓ Skip to main content

Iraq War mortality estimates: A systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Conflict and Health, March 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#35 of 657)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
24 X users
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Iraq War mortality estimates: A systematic review
Published in
Conflict and Health, March 2008
DOI 10.1186/1752-1505-2-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christine Tapp, Frederick M Burkle, Kumanan Wilson, Tim Takaro, Gordon H Guyatt, Hani Amad, Edward J Mills

Abstract

In March 2003, the United States invaded Iraq. The subsequent number, rates, and causes of mortality in Iraq resulting from the war remain unclear, despite intense international attention. Understanding mortality estimates from modern warfare, where the majority of casualties are civilian, is of critical importance for public health and protection afforded under international humanitarian law. We aimed to review the studies, reports and counts on Iraqi deaths since the start of the war and assessed their methodological quality and results.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Thailand 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 76 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 17%
Student > Master 10 12%
Researcher 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Professor 6 7%
Other 22 27%
Unknown 15 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 23 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 2%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 17 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2023.
All research outputs
#833,741
of 25,400,630 outputs
Outputs from Conflict and Health
#35
of 657 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,646
of 94,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conflict and Health
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,400,630 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 657 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,641 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.