↓ Skip to main content

Solving a Hamiltonian Path Problem with a bacterial computer

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biological Engineering, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#10 of 312)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
222 Mendeley
citeulike
8 CiteULike
connotea
3 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Solving a Hamiltonian Path Problem with a bacterial computer
Published in
Journal of Biological Engineering, July 2009
DOI 10.1186/1754-1611-3-11
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jordan Baumgardner, Karen Acker, Oyinade Adefuye, Samuel Thomas Crowley, Will DeLoache, James O Dickson, Lane Heard, Andrew T Martens, Nickolaus Morton, Michelle Ritter, Amber Shoecraft, Jessica Treece, Matthew Unzicker, Amanda Valencia, Mike Waters, AMalcolm Campbell, Laurie J Heyer, Jeffrey L Poet, Todd T Eckdahl

Abstract

The Hamiltonian Path Problem asks whether there is a route in a directed graph from a beginning node to an ending node, visiting each node exactly once. The Hamiltonian Path Problem is NP complete, achieving surprising computational complexity with modest increases in size. This challenge has inspired researchers to broaden the definition of a computer. DNA computers have been developed that solve NP complete problems. Bacterial computers can be programmed by constructing genetic circuits to execute an algorithm that is responsive to the environment and whose result can be observed. Each bacterium can examine a solution to a mathematical problem and billions of them can explore billions of possible solutions. Bacterial computers can be automated, made responsive to selection, and reproduce themselves so that more processing capacity is applied to problems over time.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 222 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 17 8%
United Kingdom 10 5%
Germany 3 1%
Netherlands 3 1%
Canada 3 1%
Spain 3 1%
Italy 3 1%
Austria 2 <1%
China 2 <1%
Other 12 5%
Unknown 164 74%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 58 26%
Researcher 40 18%
Student > Bachelor 33 15%
Student > Master 23 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 15 7%
Other 38 17%
Unknown 15 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 86 39%
Computer Science 38 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 12%
Engineering 11 5%
Physics and Astronomy 9 4%
Other 30 14%
Unknown 21 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,079,889
of 25,663,438 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biological Engineering
#10
of 312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,954
of 122,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biological Engineering
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,663,438 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 312 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,887 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them