↓ Skip to main content

RETRACTED ARTICLE: The microRNA-325 inhibits hepatocellular carcinoma progression by targeting high mobility group box 1

Overview of attention for article published in Diagnostic Pathology, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
RETRACTED ARTICLE: The microRNA-325 inhibits hepatocellular carcinoma progression by targeting high mobility group box 1
Published in
Diagnostic Pathology, July 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13000-015-0323-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Huifen Li, Weihua Huang, Rongcheng Luo

Abstract

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) can serve as tumor suppressors and might provide an efficient strategy for annihilating tumor cells. Nevertheless, the potential role of miR-325 in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is still unknown. Using RT-PCR, immunoblots invasion assays and bioinformatics strategies, we investigated the potential role of miR-325 in HCC. We showed that miR-325 was decreased and HMGB1 was increased in 99 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. MiR-325 inhibition promoted cell invasion and proliferation, while miR-325 upregulation inhibited cell invasion and proliferation by using transwell and CCK8 assays. We further showed that HMGB1 might be a direct target of miR-325 and is negatively regulated by miR-325. Down-regulation of miR-325 predicts poor prognosis for HCC patients. These findings implied that miR-325 regulates cell invasion and proliferation via targeting HMGB1 and may be a potential prognostic marker for HCC. The virtual slide(s) for this article can be found here: http://www.diagnosticpathology.diagnomx.eu/vs/4655707031717989.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Lecturer 1 11%
Student > Master 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Unknown 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 33%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2018.
All research outputs
#4,207,004
of 15,922,732 outputs
Outputs from Diagnostic Pathology
#99
of 928 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,611
of 237,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diagnostic Pathology
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,922,732 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 928 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,063 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them