↓ Skip to main content

Accurate and fast estimation of taxonomic profiles from metagenomic shotgun sequences

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
176 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
351 Mendeley
citeulike
7 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Accurate and fast estimation of taxonomic profiles from metagenomic shotgun sequences
Published in
BMC Genomics, July 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-12-s2-s4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bo Liu, Theodore Gibbons, Mohammad Ghodsi, Todd Treangen, Mihai Pop

Abstract

A major goal of metagenomics is to characterize the microbial composition of an environment. The most popular approach relies on 16S rRNA sequencing, however this approach can generate biased estimates due to differences in the copy number of the gene between even closely related organisms, and due to PCR artifacts. The taxonomic composition can also be determined from metagenomic shotgun sequencing data by matching individual reads against a database of reference sequences. One major limitation of prior computational methods used for this purpose is the use of a universal classification threshold for all genes at all taxonomic levels.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 351 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 3%
Brazil 4 1%
Germany 4 1%
United Kingdom 4 1%
Sweden 2 <1%
Estonia 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Other 6 2%
Unknown 312 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 89 25%
Researcher 80 23%
Student > Master 51 15%
Student > Bachelor 28 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 7%
Other 52 15%
Unknown 28 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 176 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 55 16%
Computer Science 33 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 3%
Environmental Science 9 3%
Other 29 8%
Unknown 38 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2020.
All research outputs
#5,413,997
of 22,655,397 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#2,155
of 10,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,629
of 119,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#15
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,655,397 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,607 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,561 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.