↓ Skip to main content

Role of DNA methylation in renal cell carcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Hematology & Oncology, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Role of DNA methylation in renal cell carcinoma
Published in
Journal of Hematology & Oncology, July 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13045-015-0180-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Niraj Shenoy, Nishanth Vallumsetla, Yiyu Zou, Jose Nahun Galeas, Makardhwaj Shrivastava, Caroline Hu, Katalin Susztak, Amit Verma

Abstract

Alterations in DNA methylation are seen in cancers and have also been examined in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). Numerous tumor suppressor genes have been reported to be partially or completely silenced due to hypermethylation of their promoters in single-locus studies, and the use of hypomethylating agents has been shown to restore the expression of many of these genes in vitro. In particular, members of the Wnt and TGF-beta pathways, pro-apoptotic genes such as APAF-1 and negative cell-cycle regulators such as KILLIN have been shown to be epigenetically silenced in numerous studies in ccRCC. Recently, TCGA analysis of a large cohort of ccRCC samples demonstrated that aberrant hypermethylation correlated with the stage and grade in kidney cancer. Our genome-wide studies also revealed aberrant widespread hypermethylation that affected regulatory regions of the kidney genome in ccRCC. We also observed that aberrant enhancer hypermethylation was predictive of adverse prognosis in ccRCC. Recent discovery of mutations affecting epigenetic regulators reinforces the importance of these changes in the pathophysiology of ccRCC and points to the potential of epigenetic modulators in the treatment of this malignancy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Croatia 1 2%
Ukraine 1 2%
Unknown 53 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 22%
Student > Bachelor 9 16%
Student > Master 9 16%
Researcher 5 9%
Other 3 5%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 10 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 11 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2015.
All research outputs
#20,283,046
of 22,817,213 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Hematology & Oncology
#1,036
of 1,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,509
of 263,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Hematology & Oncology
#18
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,817,213 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,192 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,982 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.