↓ Skip to main content

Malaria eradication and elimination: views on how to translate a vision into reality

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
40 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
106 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
334 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Malaria eradication and elimination: views on how to translate a vision into reality
Published in
BMC Medicine, July 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12916-015-0384-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marcel Tanner, Brian Greenwood, Christopher J. M. Whitty, Evelyn K. Ansah, Ric N. Price, Arjen M. Dondorp, Lorenz von Seidlein, J. Kevin Baird, James G. Beeson, Freya J.I. Fowkes, Janet Hemingway, Kevin Marsh, Faith Osier

Abstract

Although global efforts in the past decade have halved the number of deaths due to malaria, there are still an estimated 219 million cases of malaria a year, causing more than half a million deaths. In this forum article, we asked experts working in malaria research and control to discuss the ways in which malaria might eventually be eradicated. Their collective views highlight the challenges and opportunities, and explain how multi-factorial and integrated processes could eventually make malaria eradication a reality.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 334 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 330 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 88 26%
Researcher 40 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 12%
Student > Bachelor 26 8%
Student > Postgraduate 20 6%
Other 49 15%
Unknown 72 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 72 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 33 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 7%
Social Sciences 14 4%
Other 60 18%
Unknown 79 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#995,168
of 25,342,911 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#696
of 3,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,091
of 269,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#18
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,342,911 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,987 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,649 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.