↓ Skip to main content

A randomized phase 2B trial of vancomycin versus daptomycin for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia due to isolates with high vancomycin minimum inhibitory…

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A randomized phase 2B trial of vancomycin versus daptomycin for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia due to isolates with high vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations – results of a prematurely terminated study
Published in
Trials, June 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13063-018-2702-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shirin Kalimuddin, Yvonne F. Z. Chan, Rachel Phillips, Siew Pei Ong, Sophia Archuleta, David Chien Lye, Thuan Tong Tan, Jenny G. H. Low

Abstract

Studies have suggested the reduced effectiveness of vancomycin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bloodstream infections with high vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations. Alternative agents such as daptomycin may be considered. We conducted a randomized controlled study comparing daptomycin against vancomycin in the treatment of MRSA bloodstream infections with high vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations. Patients were randomized to receive vancomycin or daptomycin for a minimum of 14 days. The primary end point was the rate of all-cause mortality at day 60. A total of 14 patients were randomized in this study, with 7 patients in each treatment arm. The study was terminated early due to slow patient accrual. At day 60, there was one death in the vancomycin arm and none in the daptomycin arm. The median time to microbiological clearance was 4 days in both arms (IQR 3-5 days in the vancomycin arm and 3-7 days in daptomycin arm). Only one patient in the vancomycin arm had recurrence of bacteremia. Rates of adverse events were similar in both arms. There was one case of musculoskeletal toxicity and one case of drug-related nephrotoxicity - both events occurred in the daptomycin arm. None of the patients in either treatment arm required cessation of study treatment or addition of a second anti-MRSA agent because of worsening infection. Based on the limited number of patients evaluated in this study, it remains unclear if alternative, more expensive agents such as daptomycin are superior to vancomycin in the treatment of high vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration MRSA bloodstream infections. More studies are urgently needed but investigators may wish to consider employing novel, alternative trial methodologies to ensure a greater chance of success. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01975662 . Registered on 5 November 2013.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 21%
Other 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Student > Master 4 6%
Researcher 4 6%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 26 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 26%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 26 37%