↓ Skip to main content

The evaluation of exposure risks for natural transmission of scrapie within an infected flock

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Veterinary Research, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The evaluation of exposure risks for natural transmission of scrapie within an infected flock
Published in
BMC Veterinary Research, October 2009
DOI 10.1186/1746-6148-5-38
Pubmed ID
Authors

Glenda Dexter, Sue C Tongue, Lindsay Heasman, Susan J Bellworthy, Andrew Davis, S Jo Moore, Marion M Simmons, A Robin Sayers, Hugh A Simmons, Danny Matthews

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 28%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 17%
Professor 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 4 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 17%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 11%
Environmental Science 1 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 5 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2011.
All research outputs
#7,463,244
of 22,817,213 outputs
Outputs from BMC Veterinary Research
#647
of 3,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,341
of 93,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Veterinary Research
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,817,213 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,050 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,471 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.